|
Hepatitis
C in injecting drug users in the North West A
Multi-Agency Study
Penny A. Cook, Jim
McVeigh, Apurva Patel, Qutub Syed, Ken Mutton and Mark A. Bellis
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Viruses such as HIV, hepatitis C and hepatitis B that are transmitted
in the blood pose a major health threat for people who inject drugs. Hepatitis
C is a particular cause for concern for several reasons. Firstly, its
prevalence is extremely high among injecting drug users (IDUs) (reported
levels range between 60 - 80%). Secondly, no vaccine is as yet available,
and the rapid mutation rate of the virus makes the imminent development
of one unlikely. Thirdly, treatment is often ineffective, with even the
most advanced treatment available clearing the infection on only 40% of
occasions. Finally, a high proportion of cases (around 80%) become chronically
infected, and of these, around 20% go on to develop serious liver damage,
such as cirrhosis or hepatic carcinomas. Because individuals can have
many years of asymptomatic infection before presenting to health services
with chronic disease, the scale of the problem is hard to assess. Moreover,
in IDUs infection with multiple strains of hepatitis C or co-infection
with hepatitis B or HIV is common, and this exacerbates damage to the
liver.
In the wake of the HIV crisis and the provision of needle exchange schemes,
IDUs reduced the levels of high risk sharing behaviour. However, hepatitis
C is much more efficiently transmitted in small amounts of blood, and
infections occur via indirect sharing of other injecting paraphernalia.
At present there is no national strategy for the screening and treatment
of IDUs. Treatment requires a high level of compliance, and has unpleasant
side effects such as depression. Since IDUs often display chaotic behaviour,
they are generally not considered suitable for treatment. However, taking
a hepatitis C test and the counselling that accompanies it may represent
an opportunity for addressing risk behaviours and possibly stabilising
drug use.
Aims
Reviewing
current knowledge about hepatitis C epidemiology reveals a number of factors
that are at present unmeasured but necessary to implement effective and
economic policies for hepatitis C prevention and treatment. Key amongst
these is the level of infection in wider drug injecting communities in
the North West (not just those requesting a test or in treatment at specialist
drug agencies). Equally however, additional data are needed on the risk
behaviours associated with infection and information is required on whether
and how individuals change such behaviour once aware of their hepatitis
C serostatus. Consequently, a group of IDUs in the North West were recruited
in order to:
-
compare the prevalence of hepatitis C among drug users accessing different
types of service, and among drug users not accessing services
-
establish the extent of co-infection of hepatitis C and hepatitis B
-
elucidate risk factors for hepatitis C infection
-
explore the effect of knowledge of previous hepatitis test results on
behaviour
-
identify factors that predict sharing of equipment
-
establish a cohort for follow up and establish feasibility of monitoring
hepatitis C infection among drug using populations using saliva samples
(results not covered in this report).
Key
Findings and Recommendations
This
study has identified the following key findings and recommendations:
-
Among the 341 injecting drug users in this study, the prevalence of
hepatitis C was 53.1% (181 people), hepatitis B 26.6% (89 people) and
19.0% (65 people) were co-infected with hepatitis C and B (Section 4.1).
Although the study was relatively small, different areas of study recruitment
provided different levels of hepatitis C infection, with those presenting
to drugs services requesting a test or those in treatment with community
drugs teams having the highest prevalence. Those who had been for a
hepatitis C test before this study were 1.68 times more likely to be
hepatitis C positive in this study, again suggesting that people presenting
for tests are more likely to be hepatitis C positive (Section 4.4)
Models of health impact of hepatitis C should consider potential
variations in prevalence rates between settings and recognise that
most studies to date have assessed those most at risk of infection.
-
We crudely estimate that there are around 30,200 drug users currently
in contact with services in the North West. Using estimates of the proportion
of these injecting drugs, and applying the hepatitis C prevalence of
53% found in this study, we estimate that there are 12,800 people currently
chronically infected with hepatitis C. Of these, 2,600 will go on to
develop serious liver damage (cirrhosis or hepatic carcinoma) (Section
5.1). This figure does not include the hidden population of drug users,
previous or new users entering the drug-using population.
Health
Authorities should anticipate the increase in treatment costs associated
with treating this high number of patients with liver damage over
the next twenty years.
-
Those who are infected with hepatitis C are four times more likely to
also be infected with hepatitis B (Section 4.1). Co-infection increases
the risk of progression to serious disease.
Current
hepatitis B vaccination programmes should attempt to protect people
early in their drug injecting career before exposure to hepatitis
C.
-
Having ever visited prison, and the number of prison stays, were both
strong predictors of hepatitis C infection (Figure 1). Prison represents
a potential injecting and non-injecting risk for hepatitis C. For example
sharing of personal items such as razors may lead to infection, and
those few study participants infected but not identified as injectors
were more likely to have been in prison.
More
awareness of these other, albeit low risk, activities is needed generally
but in particular in prisons.
- Chaotic
behaviours such as polydrug use (Figure 3), use of less commonly misused
drugs (Section 4.3) and a longer history of injecting (Figure 2) all
predicted hepatitis C infection.
Harm reduction measures can be targeted at such high risk groups
and predictors identified in this study can be used as indicators
as to which populations or individuals are at most risk of infection
or most likely to be infected.
-
Significant levels of sharing were revealed. Almost 40% had shared some
form of injecting equipment over the previous four weeks, and 7% had
shared needles (Table 4). Consistent with more chaotic behaviour, sharing
injecting equipment is more likely to occur in those with polydrug use
(Section 4.5). Also, sharing injecting equipment is most common in new
injectors (those who have been injecting for up to five years) (Figure
5).
Work
is urgently needed to reach young vulnerable groups of drug users
who have recently begun injecting or may progress to injecting drugs.
Such work requires education on the risks of injecting to reduce high
risk behaviours or ideally prevent them even before they begin.
-
A previous positive result for hepatitis C did not appear to result
in a change in sharing behaviour (Section 4.4). However, those who had
presented for previous tests were more likely to be reformed sharers
(i.e. not currently sharing). This may be because counselling received
at the time of the test was successful in reducing subsequent risk behaviour
regardless of the actual results of the test. However, it may relate
to those asking for a test already having decided to protect their health.
Further work should examine in more detail the links between hepatitis
C testing and the identified reduction in sharing behaviour.
-
Sharing injecting equipment is more likely to occur in smaller groups
of fellow users (Figure 4), possibly because the user feels safe among
friends or with a partner. The high prevalence of hepatitis C in drug
users in the North West means sharing with anyone carries a high risk
of hepatitis C infection.
Information about the risks of sharing should stress this includes
close friends and sexual partners. Health information should also
help users address the problems around refusing to share with a partner.
|